Research subscriptions
One subscription for research; another to download PDFs; citations pasted by hand.
The same matter-graph workspace the firms use — tuned and priced for the advocate on a laptop at night and in court by morning. One login replaces five subscriptions and a paper diary.
The work is the lawyer's. The infrastructure is no one's. Something is always lost.
One subscription for research; another to download PDFs; citations pasted by hand.
Drafts live in a Downloads folder named 'bail 3 FINAL v2'.
Paper. Sometimes a shared Google Sheet. Never in sync with the court cause list.
Tally, an Excel invoice template, or a WhatsApp 'kindly pay' reminder.
AI takes the clerical half of a solo's day — first drafts, citation chasing, chronology assembly, invoice reconciliation — and hands it back as reviewable work. It never replaces the lawyer's judgment; it removes the work that kept the lawyer from doing judgment.
Grounded drafts with inline citations from the matter record. You review and sign; you don't assemble.
The same corpus the firms retrieve against — Supreme Court + high courts — embedded and searchable.
Chronology, last order, proceeding directions, affidavit prep, mock-hearing prompts, and coach feedback compile from your own matter record.
Never invents a case law citation, never invents a fact. Placeholders and explicit refusals when evidence is thin.
Two to three hours of first-draft assembly. An hour of citation chasing. Forty minutes reconciling the diary and cause-list. Twenty minutes building a hearing pack. Every one of those is clerical. Every one is now a few minutes of review at best — time that goes back to clients, or back to the family.
Sign in. See today's listings as soon as they're imported into your matter record. One-click hearing pack for the matters you are arguing — chronology and last order already pinned. The bench-name resolver links each scheduled judge to their profile (Supreme Court + Delhi HC live; other High Courts as their judge data lands).
Today: cause-list entries are imported per matter (paste / API / nightly job for courts with a lawful adapter). The bench resolver normalises 'Justice X & Justice Y' rosters into clickable judge profiles with the high-quality confidence floor. New court adapters ship only after source-readiness proof.
Chronology, last order, proceeding directions, oral points, and source-backed bench context assembled from the matter record. Under a minute.
The UI stays legible on a 9-inch screen. No hover-only actions. No surprise modals.
Open a matter. Pick a template — bail, quashing, reply to summons, §34 petition. Add a focus note. Press Generate. Get a draft with inline citations to named judgments and fact placeholders for anything not in the record.
Inline citations resolve to named authorities. Nothing is invented. Fact gaps render as placeholders for you to fill.
BNSS vs BNS clamped; Arbitration Act sections attributed by the right subsection; no cross-statute confusion.
At the foot of every draft: open fact placeholders, citation coverage, statute checks. A 30-second pre-filing sanity pass.
2–3 hours of first-draft assembly, plus an hour of citation chasing, per bail or quashing. That is a billable afternoon back, every day.
The review is still yours. The clerical work isn't.
When the listing's bench is resolved and relevant decisions are indexed, appeal preparation can use that source context. Limited coverage stays visible. Only source-verified statute provisions are available for attachment; catalog coverage remains incomplete.
When the next listing's bench is resolved, drafting can use indexed authorities from that bench. Missing or weak history is disclosed as a limitation.
Attach available verified provisions as cited, opposing or contextual references. Inspect the exact source version; catalogued does not mean verified.
The Appeal Strength panel flags per-ground citation coverage and weak-evidence paths. The advocate decides; the system stays on source-backed preparation.
Search indexed authorities by legal issue and inspect the returned sources. Ranking supports research; it does not establish that a decision applies to your matter.
Search with issue phrases or keywords, then inspect the authority, jurisdiction and source context of each result.
Flag or shortlist an authority for your matter. Annotations travel with the matter, not you.
If your query sits outside the corpus, you get an explicit no-result — not a fabricated citation.
Matter invoice PDFs, GST/TDS adjustments, partial payments, write-offs, and audit are live. Pine Labs payment collection remains disabled until UAT credentials, webhook evidence, settlement/refund/dispute proof, and founder go/no-go are complete.
Log time from the matter. Draft the invoice. Send. Get paid. Every state change on the audit trail.
GST on the invoice row. Monthly report exports to the format your accountant already uses.
Not a free-text note. Every recovery state is a real record.
Solos get a cleaner recovery workflow: invoice, payment state, write-off, and audit are in the matter record. External payment links remain provider-gated until UAT evidence is complete.
Early access means pilot pricing. The full rate card firms up after we understand how a solo actually uses the product. Lock in pilot terms now.
per lawyer / month
Solo pilots are handled directly by the founder until we are larger. Expect a human reply within a working day.
Tell us the forum you appear in most and the two case types that take up the most of your week. We set up the sandbox, send a login, and jump on a 30-minute call to run through it with you.